3 ms·
Probably worth noting that the asymmetric break of the undecideds in 2016 was what won the election for Trump. There were a lot of undecided voters and a lot o
by evgen 6y ago
Probably worth noting that the asymmetric break of the undecideds in 2016 was what won the election for Trump. There were a lot of undecided voters and a lot of them decided for Trump late in the process so models that assumed a traditional 50-50 split were wrong.
- cloudwizard 6y agoIt breaks against the least popular. Clinton was a known unpopular. Now that everyone knows Trump, he was the least popular.
- humanrebar 6y agoOr they were decided and weren't forthright about it.