Hmm. My knee-jerk response is that the example you give is not in any way denialism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turner_syndrome https://en.wikipedia.org/wik

Hmm. My knee-jerk response is that the example you give is not in any way denialism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turner_syndrome https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turner_syndrome https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_gonadal_dysgenesis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_gonadal_dysgenesis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_X_syndrome https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_X_syndrome https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrasomy_X https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrasomy_X https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentasomy_X https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentasomy_X https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XX_male_syndrome https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XX_male_syndrome Clearly it takes more than a dichotomy of chromosomal options to define one's gender. You're drastically oversimplifying "biological science" in order to put forth an example of the left denying scientific fact. More importantly though, the left's "agenda" with regards to trans people isn't about rejecting medical or scientific consensus on gender. A trans woman's doctor is still going to give her advice tailored to her specific case of being born with a male body. It's about accepting people for who they want to be, and that doesn't clash with any category of facts or knowledge. Implying otherwise is disingenuous.