6 ms·
Can anyone actually refute this instead of downvoting it? It's a really important point. Sorry to "both sides" it but I also think there's a good chance that i
by benlumen 6y ago
Can anyone actually refute this instead of downvoting it? It's a really important point.
Sorry to "both sides" it but I also think there's a good chance that if Democrats were making allegations of voter fraud it'd be trending, not flagged.
- dodobirdlord 6y agoSure, I refer you to the body of evidence presented at the impeachment trial of Donald Trump that demonstrated that he has worked with foreign governments to illegally influence US elections.
- paulddraper 6y agoThe impeachment was not over the 2016 election. I point to Mueller report which looked for collusion between the Trump campaign and foreign countries and found none.
- brandmeyer 6y agoThat's just it, though. The Mueller report found tons of collusion and obstruction of justice. It deliberately referred those to the Congress.
- wankerrific 6y agoI challenge your assertion that the report found no collusion. You have not read the unredacted report nor has anyone outside of a select few in govt
- paulddraper 6y agoThey certainly never indicted anyone for it.
- sfkdjf9j3j 6y agoThat's not true either, the investigation resulted in 34 indictments.
- tengbretson 6y agoindictments for...
- sfkdjf9j3j 6y agoAmericans were indicted for lying to Congress, lying to the FBI, witness tampering, and a few other crimes related to inconsistent testimonies and lies, etc. And of course a bunch of Russian nationals were "indicted" for "crimes against the United States" type things but nobody is under the illusion they'll actually be prosecuted.