3 ms·

I severely doubt that someone would non-anonymously choose to be the single person that gave away the election to their declared opponent, weeks after being a l

I severely doubt that someone would non-anonymously choose to be the single person that gave away the election to their declared opponent, weeks after being a loyal partisan.

anonymousab 6y ago
If there's one thing I don't doubt, it's people's dedication to a president they believe is the only person fighting the 'deep state' and other things along those lines. I can easily see it spun (or justified) as "defending democracy" rather than upending it.
- otterley 6y ago
  Then why didn't it happen with faithless electors in 2016?
  - tu12 6y ago
    There were 10 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faithless_electors_in_the_2016_United_States_presidential_election https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faithless_electors_in_the_2016...
    - otterley 6y ago
      Importantly, though: "... only two... defected from the winner."