4 ms·

It would also make him the only person from the Silent Generation [0] to ever be elected President of the United States. As Biden is at the very youngest end of

It would also make him the only person from the Silent Generation [0] to ever be elected President of the United States. As Biden is at the very youngest end of the generation, he will likely remain the only one. [0] Using the Strauss-Howe definitions of generations https://www.lifecourse.com/about/method/the-generational-constellation.html https://www.lifecourse.com/about/method/the-generational-con... Edit: Silents were born 1925-1942. Just thought I should mention it here so you don't have to click the link. Biden was born in November 1942, so he's just before the cutoff.

mFixman 6y ago
It's chilling how nobody born between 1924 and 1942 (or 1946 if Biden doesn't count yet) became the President or even tbe candidate of any major political party during a US election. Maybe people who grew up during the Great Depression had less opportunities? Or maybe baby boomers born right after the war overcame the silent generation in influence by numbers.
- amyjess 6y ago
  I think part of it was also how long the G.I. Generation stuck around. At the time when you'd expect to start seeing Silent presidents, Reagan won election as the then-oldest person to have ever been elected president and was popular enough he had two terms and got his VP elected afterwards. If Reagan's first term had flopped (or maybe even if he'd never run at all, though that's really speculative), we would've gotten President Mondale in 1984. Or we might have seen a Silent as early as 1980 if Ted Kennedy won his primary challenge. I think we're starting to see a similar phenomenon with Generation X being pushed out by long-lived Boomers and even a couple of Silents, but at least we had Obama (born 1961, so he barely counts) in between Boomers. With that said, it's not for lack of trying that we haven't had a Silent president. Aside from the aforementioned Mondale and Kennedy's attempt, we've also had Michael Dukakis and John McCain as major-party nominees, the only third-party candidate who had a chance in Ross Perot, plus Bernie Sanders was a major contender and runner-up for the Democratic nomination twice.
- legolas2412 6y ago
  A few minutes of wikipedia-ing and found Walter Mondale, born 1928.

mFixman 6y ago

It's chilling how nobody born between 1924 and 1942 (or 1946 if Biden doesn't count yet) became the President or even tbe candidate of any major political party during a US election. Maybe people who grew up during the Great Depression had less opportunities? Or maybe baby boomers born right after the war overcame the silent generation in influence by numbers.

amyjess 6y ago
I think part of it was also how long the G.I. Generation stuck around. At the time when you'd expect to start seeing Silent presidents, Reagan won election as the then-oldest person to have ever been elected president and was popular enough he had two terms and got his VP elected afterwards. If Reagan's first term had flopped (or maybe even if he'd never run at all, though that's really speculative), we would've gotten President Mondale in 1984. Or we might have seen a Silent as early as 1980 if Ted Kennedy won his primary challenge. I think we're starting to see a similar phenomenon with Generation X being pushed out by long-lived Boomers and even a couple of Silents, but at least we had Obama (born 1961, so he barely counts) in between Boomers. With that said, it's not for lack of trying that we haven't had a Silent president. Aside from the aforementioned Mondale and Kennedy's attempt, we've also had Michael Dukakis and John McCain as major-party nominees, the only third-party candidate who had a chance in Ross Perot, plus Bernie Sanders was a major contender and runner-up for the Democratic nomination twice.
legolas2412 6y ago
A few minutes of wikipedia-ing and found Walter Mondale, born 1928.