4 ms·
Georgia and Pennsylvania don't have laws preventing faithless electors from voting against their state's winning candidate. It's looking like the lead will be
by RandallBrown 6y ago
Georgia and Pennsylvania don't have laws preventing faithless electors from voting against their state's winning candidate.
It's looking like the lead will be big enough that even in the (very) small chance things go wrong it won't matter.
- ibejoeb 6y ago>small chance things go wrong for some definition of wrong
- srtjstjsj 6y agoI severely doubt that someone would non-anonymously choose to be the single person that gave away the election to their declared opponent, weeks after being a loyal partisan.
- anonymousab 6y agoIf there's one thing I don't doubt, it's people's dedication to a president they believe is the only person fighting the 'deep state' and other things along those lines. I can easily see it spun (or justified) as "defending democracy" rather than upending it.
- otterley 6y agoThen why didn't it happen with faithless electors in 2016?