4 ms·
Everybody does realize that this has no legal significance, right?
by CurtHagenlocher 6y ago
Everybody does realize that this has no legal significance, right?
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- adamch 6y agoIt's predictive of a forthcoming legally-significant event.
- User23 6y agoSurely somewhere in the emanations and penumbras of the constitution we can find that the AP’s decision is binding.
- dentemple 6y agoAs Hamilton famously wrote in Federalist Paper #85: "It's not official until it's Facebook Official."
- notatoad 6y agoYes, I'm pretty sure everybody here understands that AP doesn't officially decide who wins the election. It still has significance.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- nooyurrsdey 6y agowhat an obnoxious way to rain on a parade. everyone is more than aware of how the electoral system works.
- GavinMcG 6y agoLooking around the thread you'll see that might not be the case. I think the comment meant to correct a (hopefully uncommon) misconception that the election is now final before all the votes have been counted, which of course isn't true.
- A4ET8a8uTh0 6y agoYes, but note how quickly it was picked up by general populace as fait accompli.
- handmodel 6y agoDo you realize no one thinks it has legal significance? But it is a marker that people use as shorthand. There is no getting around the fact that Biden will have 270 electoral votes.
- googthrowaway42 6y ago> Do you realize no one thinks it has legal significance? Almost everyone does.
- dllthomas 6y agoThere absolutely is room for Biden not to have 270 electoral votes, if investigations reveal (... correctly or incorrectly) big enough issues that some states don't send electors. I don't think there's a realistic way for Trump to have 270 electoral votes, but he could still possibly be awarded the Presidency by a weird-ass one-vote-per-state vote in the House.