In both art and code, there are objective differences between high-quality and poor-quality products. The hard part isn't finding the differences between good

In both art and code, there are objective differences between high-quality and poor-quality products. The hard part isn't finding the differences between good and bad code. The hard part is finding differences between good code and average code. There is also a big difference between pointing out examples of quality code and being able to establish guidelines that lead to quality code. In other words, I do think that much of what determines "quality" code comes down to what aspects the person viewing the code believes are the most important.