3 ms·
I just wish currently illicit/scheduled drugs simply had the same list of disclaimers that FDA-approved drugs had. The side effects aren't different enough to b
by vmception 6y ago
I just wish currently illicit/scheduled drugs simply had the same list of disclaimers that FDA-approved drugs had. The side effects aren't different enough to be rebuttals to support their prohibition.
- User23 6y agoA lot of it is a quality control issue. The cocaine your ophthalmologist might use is just as safe as any other FDA-approved drug, because it is one. On the other hand the stuff you might get third-hand from the cartels was possibly of questionable quality to begin with and has been adulterated several times by various intermediaries.
- vmception 6y agoThis is why I prefer legalization instead of just decriminalization Consumer protection and ability to address the supply chain only comes with legalization Decriminalization is just 1800s snake oil’s salesmen at the World Fair
- freeone3000 6y agoAll drugs except schedule I are approved for some therapy, so have the same list of disclaimers and side effect notations (with a smaller sample size than normal). Amphetamine, cocaine, and ketamine are schedule II and III; Cannabis is schedule I.
- MacsHeadroom 6y agoMost schedule 1 substances are much safer than substantially similar alternatives in their pure forms. The real reason they remain in schedule 1 is because they've been around too long for any major pharma company to have a monopoly on them. Cannabis isn't even a drug, it's a whole class of plants of a handful of related species. So it's the exception here.