4 ms·
nothing wrong with asking, but you might want to consider that your bias is heavily influencing your perspective of science. You make some valid points about th
by shlant 6y ago
nothing wrong with asking, but you might want to consider that your bias is heavily influencing your perspective of science. You make some valid points about the replication bias, profit motives etc. but throwing the baby out with the bath water and then claiming that anecdotes are somehow more reliable shows a lack of nuance in response to a very complex topic.
- feralimal 6y agoYes - I think I knew what n=1 is/was. There were 2 reasons I asked the question. Firstly, I don't like 'inside baseball' talk. In fact we are not at a science convention - it is a public forum. Secondly, I want to know what the poster means by it. The last sentence where they say: "those where not tested because again N=1" - that doesn't make sense.