4 ms·
Downvoted because of the ad hominem attacks; the author did not "secretly" videotape anyone, he asked his supervisor's permission first. Furthermore, he never
by blahedo 16y ago
Downvoted because of the ad hominem attacks; the author did not "secretly" videotape anyone, he asked his supervisor's permission first. Furthermore, he never said he resented the fact that his red (contractor) badge didn't give him full company privileges; rather he was documenting how many of them he did get to contrast them with the lack of privileges of the yellow (also contractor?) badges.
- bane 16y agoFirst apologies for the ad hominem attacks, and thanks for calling me out on them. It's shoddy thinking that belongs more on a Fox opinion show than on HN. http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2501121 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2501121 Second, Thanks also for providing an explanation for your downvote. I'm one of the few that believe a comment should be required for an upvote on HN because there are simply too many reasonable comments that get slammed without explanation (not saying my comment was unreasonable, just applauding your comment in response). Third, I disagree with you. Even on a plain scan of the page, the very first thing he has up there is one of the videos he was supposed to turn in before termination that he mysteriously: a) brought home, which wasn't his property b) couldn't find upon request That opens the piece as disingenuous and the rest follows from there. The entire piece reads as a cry for attention which of course we are all giving him.