>Further along in the article it shows the problem is provincial law, not the policy of an American company: That is, as I read it, merely saying that the prov

>Further along in the article it shows the problem is provincial law, not the policy of an American company: That is, as I read it, merely saying that the provincial law allows them to ban wearing it not that it requires them to ban it. So the issue is very much with the company and not with the law unless you're saying that we're only allowed to complain about things that are illegal?