3 ms·
While I agree that we should strive for accuracy, you're really splitting hairs there. Plus the author puts a disclaimer in there "NOTE: This is a gross simplif
by stuff4ben 6y ago
While I agree that we should strive for accuracy, you're really splitting hairs there. Plus the author puts a disclaimer in there "NOTE: This is a gross simplification and is NOT technically accurate should you be looking to get involved with the underlying cgroup code. The above explanation is meant for clarity of understanding."
- jeffbee 6y agoBut the explanation does not contribute to clarity of understanding. This has nothing to do with hacking on cgroups itself. As a user of cgroups you should know that one group may control multiple processes, and one process may be controlled by multiple groups! There certainly is not a 1:1 correspondence.
- kortilla 6y agoIt’s not an internal detail, it’s fundamental to understanding it from a user perspective.