I find the language used by Reuters odd. Can someone explain the odd amount of glee it seems to take at Jack's change of fortune? I am not aware of any inherent

I find the language used by Reuters odd. Can someone explain the odd amount of glee it seems to take at Jack's change of fortune? I am not aware of any inherent bias thus, but I can't tell if Reuters is becoming more clickbaity or there is some actual bias behind it.