The defendant doesn't need to say anything, that's the point. The prosecution has to do all the leg work. And they may literally have no other evidence. - Can

The defendant doesn't need to say anything, that's the point. The prosecution has to do all the leg work. And they may literally have no other evidence. - Can the prosecution show where and how Mr. X moved the funds while he was in jail? - Can they show who he communicated with or ordered to abscond these funds? - Can they identify who controls the funds now? - Can they identify anyone else who may have had control of these funds while in their previous wallet? - Can the prosecution rule with 100% certainty that this was not a hack or theft by some other party, including police? The answer to those is probably no. Is that enough to convince a judge/jury of reasonable doubt? I'm not a lawyer.