3 ms·
>striking a balance between stoic detachment but still maintaining the emotional connections that bond us as humans. This isn't new to Sherman, she is just ref
by spacemark 6y ago
>striking a balance between stoic detachment but still maintaining the emotional connections that bond us as humans.
This isn't new to Sherman, she is just reforming for our modern times similar arguments made by the ancients. None of the ancient Stoics endorsed unfeeling detachment. They endorsed detachment from things not in our control, but they rejected the Cynic school's conclusion that living according to nature meant asceticism. To the contrary, to ancient Stoics civil action and involvement was a duty, and enjoying our emotions to the fullest was the very reward eudaimonia promised.
- bumby 6y agoI agree. To the articles point, the (little "s") stoicism is conflated with the philosophy and sometimes misinterpreted in this regard. I've just personally found her writings more accessible for addressing the original texts on this point.