4 ms·
A 2020 version of this might be "why there aren't more Teslas." Elon's might be a rare cat, but he's probably not one in eight billion. At this point, changing
by dalbasal 6y ago
A 2020 version of this might be "why there aren't more Teslas."
Elon's might be a rare cat, but he's probably not one in eight billion. At this point, changing the world with a new FB or Google is more about dislodging monopolies then it is about innovation. Meanwhile, a promising startup in this space would find it quite easy to get big/late stage funding because of acquisitions.
A "tesla" will have a hard time getting funded for precisely the reasons laid out by paul.
The difference though, is that manufacturing is actually capital intensive. Google & Facebook needed investors to cover rent and salaries for a few years. Making lots of bets isn't as viable. You do actually need to make good bets.
Meanwhile, in the google/fb space it is now more true that acquisitions and monopoly dynamics are a major hindrance to "more googles." Investors certainly aren't shy to make these investments. Investments in Teslas are depressed by conservativism and ability to pick winners.
- 0xquad 6y ago> A 2020 version of this might be "why there aren't more Teslas." It's interesting how many electric car companies are active in China, most of which westerners haven't heard of. (Check for example the video of the "Chengdu Motor Show" by FullyChargedShow on YT.) Relevant to the topic at hand, it seems that the "More Googles" are more likely to be arising in China, mostly outside my reality bubble. Some helped by market segregation enforced by the current political situation. That's orthogonal to the overall topic, but not irrelevant.