4 ms·
The secret rule that your employer may not want to pay you, allow you on-site, and provide you access to their resources while you film an exposé on their labor
by jcnnghm 15y ago
The secret rule that your employer may not want to pay you, allow you on-site, and provide you access to their resources while you film an exposé on their labor practices that could potentially open them to outside scrutiny, legal and otherwise. Especially as you try to paint them as racists when they ask what you're doing. They would have been justified for firing him for stupidity.
- scotty79 15y agoHe was fired for talking to other employees (he secretly not supposed to) and acquiring gear and permision to film some of them and actually doing it (what he secretly not supposed to) but mainly about being honest and transparent about reasons for his curiosity. You are right. He must have been a retard and as such he wasn't fit to do any job for Google contractor.
- jcnnghm 15y agoI'm pretty sure he was fired because the honest and transparent reasons he had were totally inappropriate, and he was condescending and argumentative while positing some rather harsh allegations. I did not say anything about him being a "retard", I said they should have fired him for stupidity. There is a difference.
- scotty79 15y agoI guess that I'm not that sensitive to racial issues as I was born and raised in all white country, to see more than just curiosity about what yellow badgers do why they are mostly people of color and why they don't have perks and why people generally don't know them. I also fail to see how him being perceived as argumentative and condescending makes him unfit for the job. I used "retard" as a synonym for "having the quality of stupidity" perhaps incorectly. I apologize.