3 ms·

Completely agree with everything you said. But how does woke and liberal politics square with almost complete apathy to the the plight of the homeless (or of th

by rmk 6y ago

Completely agree with everything you said. But how does woke and liberal politics square with almost complete apathy to the the plight of the homeless (or of those verging on homelessness)? Almost nothing has been done to make housing affordable (even very modest, incremental bills in this regard have been shot down). If you consider the plight of agricultural workers and housing for them, you would be even more befuddled. 9.2% sales tax? Regressive tax on the poor. Gasoline tax? Again, hurts the poor the most. What am I missing here?

deleted 6y ago
[deleted]
scottlocklin 6y ago
What you're missing is the "left" has long since transferred its affections away from poor people who are not wards of the state. "Woke" politics magically appeared in 2008 when leftists were manning occupy wall street, which pretty much immediately degenerated into escalating virtue signalling instead of, you know, making some reforms to wall street. I'm sure that was a total coincidence.
- rmk 6y ago
  Well, it did appear to result in the CFPB (the thing that Elizabeth Warren was heading?) and Dodd-Frank, perhaps (one can never attribute these things to some particular movement or event, I feel). I don't know if they have been defanged already. Anyhoo, so what is the pet constituency of the left? They do appear to be falling over themselves to regularise illegal immigrants (perhaps the Latinos in Texas handing Trump a win will give them pause?), while doing nothing for legal immigrants (who power the only growth sector America has going for it, technology.) They certainly don't care much for the working poor, as you have rightly pointed out.
  - scottlocklin 6y ago
    Related: a "stirring" defense of child labor from a Gates foundation apparatchik that got published in the left-leaning guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/nov/06/child-labour-doesnt-have-to-be-exploitation-it-gave-me-life-skills https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/nov/06/c... Pretty sure Gates is a Democrat! Yeah, man, Child Labor laws are so 19th century.

by rmk 6y ago

deleted 6y ago

[deleted]

scottlocklin 6y ago

What you're missing is the "left" has long since transferred its affections away from poor people who are not wards of the state. "Woke" politics magically appeared in 2008 when leftists were manning occupy wall street, which pretty much immediately degenerated into escalating virtue signalling instead of, you know, making some reforms to wall street. I'm sure that was a total coincidence.

rmk 6y ago
Well, it did appear to result in the CFPB (the thing that Elizabeth Warren was heading?) and Dodd-Frank, perhaps (one can never attribute these things to some particular movement or event, I feel). I don't know if they have been defanged already. Anyhoo, so what is the pet constituency of the left? They do appear to be falling over themselves to regularise illegal immigrants (perhaps the Latinos in Texas handing Trump a win will give them pause?), while doing nothing for legal immigrants (who power the only growth sector America has going for it, technology.) They certainly don't care much for the working poor, as you have rightly pointed out.
- scottlocklin 6y ago
  Related: a "stirring" defense of child labor from a Gates foundation apparatchik that got published in the left-leaning guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/nov/06/child-labour-doesnt-have-to-be-exploitation-it-gave-me-life-skills https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/nov/06/c... Pretty sure Gates is a Democrat! Yeah, man, Child Labor laws are so 19th century.