3 ms·
This is mildly misleading. RIAA's argument is mostly about the marketing for use with copyrighted content. The statute clearly doesn't say what EFF is saying RI
by ikeboy 6y ago
This is mildly misleading. RIAA's argument is mostly about the marketing for use with copyrighted content. The statute clearly doesn't say what EFF is saying RIAA thinks it says, and I don't see any indication that RIAA actually thinks or claims that interpretation.
- nullc 6y ago> about the marketing for use with You mean the fact that buried deep inside some test scripts were test targets to test specific URL encoding schemes that only exist on uploads by specific youtube partners (e.g. VEVO) by downloading and discarding less than 1 second of video? The youtube-dl documentation uses free videos uploaded by youtube-dl developers and by the Linux foundation. The claims that youtube-dl used RIAA member copyrighted works as examples in their docs are false.