2 ms·
But again, bzr and launchpad are their own tools. If they are bad it's not an argument for snap. Other distros have their packages updated very quickly without
by Darmody 6y ago
But again, bzr and launchpad are their own tools. If they are bad it's not an argument for snap.
Other distros have their packages updated very quickly without snap.
- kd913 6y ago> But again, bzr and launchpad are their own tools. If they are bad it's not an argument for snap. This logic makes no sense whatsoever. If the previous tools are cumbersome and bad, and Canonical releases a new mechanism that is easier to develop/use/release. How the hell is that not an argument for the new mechanism? What is this logic? Nevermind that this new process is already integrated into several CI pipelines at Microsoft, VLC, Mozilla, Google, Amazon, JetBrains, KDE and Spotify.