2 ms·
That could fly, something like the brand name is good and is cheaper than the licensing fees they had offered And just repeat growth over and over again
by vmception 6y ago
That could fly, something like the brand name is good and is cheaper than the licensing fees they had offered
And just repeat growth over and over again
- salawat 6y agoThat's also misrepresenting material facts (in my view, which matters diddly squat in a courtroom without the right lawyer), and lying by omission. The fact that "proving" malintent in the U.S. in M&A's and market shaping revolves around someone finding a rather fiendishly worded memo is somewhat laughable. >"You can't prove I was going to take a cookie! Maybe I just like having my hand in the jar!" If it would get the stink eye from my Mom, the same argument form should not be considered a valid approach to business or legality.
- SilasX 6y agoFair enough, maybe not the best example. The point is just that they'd have to beat around the bush and not be able to give a good enough reason that justifies a solid buyout price without admitting the monopolist strategy.