Wow, I just went ahead and read the exchange from the links you just posted. It really did seem like they were trying to force the repo into compliance knowing

Wow, I just went ahead and read the exchange from the links you just posted. It really did seem like they were trying to force the repo into compliance knowing they couldn't file a proper DMCA takedown to GitHub, under the guise of collaboration. I understand the need for open source funding, I really do. But getting in cahoots with the music industry, which is well known for how corrupt and draconian in its enforcement is and basically arguing (or rather dodging the issue again and again) that no other licensing models on the same platform can coexist, may not be the right way, even if they claim that the people who take issue with such approach are "less than 50" because in the end, they can simply change the terms at any moment and leave you in the dust.