I quoted that bit because that's the piece that's being widely discussed. It does say that they're thinking of suggesting that the private dwelling exemption is

I quoted that bit because that's the piece that's being widely discussed. It does say that they're thinking of suggesting that the private dwelling exemption is removed, but that covers a wide range of options: 1) Remove it and criminalise "stirring up" in private dwellings 2) Remove it and add private conversations in private dwellings, thus continuing to allow stirring up in private dwellings unless it's a public meeting in someone's home 3) Remove it and add protections for private conversations, thus adding protections for hate speech that are private conversations but not in the home. It's a consultation, this is how Law Commission consultations work. Your unfamiliarity with them doesn't make you right, it just means you don't know how they work.