> In comparison, Go does breaking changes from time to time, but it is also a much younger project. In general, comparing a language syntax with an api is hard

> In comparison, Go does breaking changes from time to time, but it is also a much younger project. In general, comparing a language syntax with an api is hard to draw meaningful conclusions from. Could you give some examples? I would say go has a very high standard of backwards compatibility (to a fault, even. Many good changes are not merged because they could break existing go programs.)