3 ms·
Except when it doesn't. Take the current elections in the US as an example. Yes, the system's working and it has proven to be quite resilient but those shenani
by BjoernKW 6y ago
Except when it doesn't.
Take the current elections in the US as an example. Yes, the system's working and it has proven to be quite resilient but those shenanigans involving mail-in ballots and the uncertainty that came with that for example could've been avoided with a properly designed digital system.
Most of those problems could of course be solved with a properly designed non-digital system, too.
- matt_s 6y agoEven a properly designed digital system will have flaws and if it is on a network it can be hacked at scale. Hacking paper ballots cannot be achieved at the scale necessary to sway a national election. Its similar to a story I read a while ago about flooding a lottery system with enough combinations of numbers to near guarantee some level of profit. The scale needed to fill out, submit, track, etc. 10's of thousands of tickets was ridiculous. There is no need to speed up the election process. If any human effort is to be spent, it should go towards rolling back the perceived need for constant updates. Its unhealthy.