3 ms·
"It would also constrain the various competing solutions to all conform to the git standard. " That's already more-or-less the case. Gitlab refuses to add Hg s
by Qwertious 6y ago
"It would also constrain the various competing solutions to all conform to the git standard. "
That's already more-or-less the case. Gitlab refuses to add Hg support because they pretty much hardcoded their platform around Git and don't want to abstract that away. Github doesn't support Hg. And in August, Bitbucket permanently disabled their Hg support too.
Personally, I want to see Git die. But you're talking about pantomime portability here.
- MaxBarraclough 6y agoI wasn't talking about support for version-control systems other than git. I was talking about the way GitHub, GitLab, and SourceHut, can all offer different bug-reporting/wiki features. These features aren't predetermined by the git standard, and that's a good thing.