> Depends, I maintain that Paul Le Roux is the most likely Satoshi, and of course -- if true -- that would be why Paul Le Roux created it. [1] Okay. And that's

> Depends, I maintain that Paul Le Roux is the most likely Satoshi, and of course -- if true -- that would be why Paul Le Roux created it. [1] Okay. And that's partially why I'm open to the idea of the government ceasing to use public resources on whitelisting all transactions, instead of debating you over whether something is or isn't money laundering. Structuring is a different crime than money laundering, which is actually another exhibit on why I want the government to cease using bothering using public money and resources on whitelisting all transactions. I read enough court cases on Google Scholar about paranoid people doing legal things convicted for only structuring on Google Scholar to make this opinion, and this was before HSBC got a slap on the wrist for literally accepting cash deposits from the literal cartel and getting caught, undermining the whole point of whitelisting transactions to begin with.