3 ms·
I agree with the effort to find privacy solutions, but it seems like enforcement of surveillance bans like this will be an uphill battle as long as the physical
by heyitsguay 6y ago
I agree with the effort to find privacy solutions, but it seems like enforcement of surveillance bans like this will be an uphill battle as long as the physical video hardware remains present. 2020's cutting-edge facial tracking systems will be 2022's Intro to PyTorch tutorial, available to anyone with a $500 GPU. As long as video is being captured and stored, how do you realistically prevent it from being subject to analysis somewhere?
- heavyset_go 6y agoAnyone can pick up a HackRF and probably get away with skirting the FCC's ire if they're very careful about it. If they try to use it to develop a product that interferes with licensed RF and that they plan to sell, they won't get very far. Similarly, some person in their garage won't be stopped from violating this law as long as they're careful about it. This law stops facial recognition products from being mass deployed and being made ubiquitous, though. The same logic applies to someone cooking meth in their garage. They'll probably get away with it if they're careful, but good luck turning that into a legitimate business.