4 ms·
Do you all need all 5GB of photos? Probably not. I'd venture that: -- the total number of shots can be edited down to the 'keepers' -- web-resolution is suffi
by joshwa 18y ago
Do you all need all 5GB of photos? Probably not. I'd venture that:
-- the total number of shots can be edited down to the 'keepers'
-- web-resolution is sufficient for 95% of the photos being traded
Have everyone edit out the losers, batch process down to 800px jpegs, upload to a flickr group, and then transmit the ones you need higher-res versions of individually via email or mediafire or similar.
- hhm 18y agoI guess they probably include videos too.
- joshwa 18y agoOP said DSLRs, but for video the same thing applies. Downres to something reasonable for sharing, and limit the output-quality transfers to the ones you know you want. This is how even professionals shooting 50-200GB/day do things-- nobody delivers a HD with every single outtake, but instead they just post a web gallery of the candidates and then deliver the high-res files of the just the final selects.
- jgamman 18y agoyeah, that's the obvious first step but seriously, have you met digital photo hobbyists? every photo is precious and they never want to let someone else cull before they get the chance to see your files... trust me, give your (photo nuts) friends all your photos ;-)