4 ms·
Because government is elected by people. Only small portion of people is addicted to drugs, so majority pushed the law against addicts.
by drran 6y ago
Because government is elected by people. Only small portion of people is addicted to drugs, so majority pushed the law against addicts.
- tekknik 6y agoBecause an addict should just be given whatever they’re addicted too to further their misery and keep them addicted.
- bird_monster 6y agoCan you point out how making a drug illegal keeps it out of the hands of addicts? Sure seems like cocaine has been doing just fine while illegal...
- tekknik 6y agoBecause you can’t just go to the store and buy it like you can MJ? We are already seeing an uptick in addictions from MJ, which is much less addicting than cocaine. So, can you point to something showing how decriminalization doesn’t increase the availability, and therefore the suffering of the addicts? Also have you ever been an addict? Are you talking out of experience? If not, then kindly sit down and shut up.
- bird_monster 6y ago> Because you can’t just go to the store and buy it like you can MJ? We are already seeing an uptick in addictions from MJ, which is much less addicting than cocaine. Responding to a request for source without a source is great. > So, can you point to something showing how decriminalization doesn’t increase the availability Ignoring a request for source and then asking for source. > Also have you ever been an addict? Are you talking out of experience? If not, then kindly sit down and shut up. This is a garbage response and shouldn't be welcome on this site. edit Your response is also junk because decriminalization is not the same as legalization, and decriminalization is not the same as allowing dispensaries (medical or otherwise). So your point just kind doesn't make sense with the subject matter and scenario we're talking about.