3 ms·
Nice! I'll keep it in mind. I agree (as I mentioned at the end of my post), if it already exists it should just be promoted. Perhaps a bit of a wrapper could be
by orblivion 16y ago
Nice! I'll keep it in mind. I agree (as I mentioned at the end of my post), if it already exists it should just be promoted. Perhaps a bit of a wrapper could be built too, but it's not bad as it is.
So, sorry, just to be clear, what does the ... mean?
- colanderman 16y ago"Fill in the blank" (it's a Unicode ... if it's not showing up for you). i.e. tar xzf /usr/src/packagex.1.2.3.tar.gz; diff -u the/file.c.orig the/file.c; etc. Granted, tar & diff are the two steps which could most stand to be streamlined (and are by your git approach), but at least they're nothing earth-shattering.
- orblivion 16y agoPlus, I wonder if it might be easier for the maintainers to deal with git than with patches. Depends on what they're used to I guess.