4 ms·
That’s the only place that literal text appears, but there are several other references to it (“subdivision (a)”) — > (3) Any statute that prohibits app-based
by panic 6y ago
That’s the only place that literal text appears, but there are several other references to it (“subdivision (a)”) —
> (3) Any statute that prohibits app-based drivers from performing a particular rideshare service or delivery service while allowing other individuals or entities to perform the same rideshare service or delivery service, or otherwise imposes unequal regulatory burdens upon app-based drivers based on their classifcation status, constitutes an amendment of this chapter and must be enacted in compliance with the procedures governing amendments consistent with the purposes of this chapter as set forth in subdivisions (a) and (b).
> (4) Any statute that authorizes any entity or organization to represent the interests of app-based drivers in connection with drivers’ contractual relationships with network companies, or drivers’ compensation, benefts, or working conditions, constitutes an amendment of this chapter and must be enacted in compliance with the procedures governing amendments consistent with the purposes of this chapter as set forth in subdivisions (a) and (b).
> (d) Any statute that imposes additional misdemeanor or felony penalties in order to provide greater protection against criminal activity for app-based drivers and individuals using rideshare services or delivery services may be enacted by the Legislature by rollcall vote entered into the journal, a majority of the membership of each house concurring, without complying with subdivisions (a) and (b).
- renewiltord 6y agoRight, those pieces are there for good reason, but aren't really relevant to the discriminator question: "Can seven-eighths of legislators overturn this proposition?" And the secondary discriminator question: "If a ballot proposition is passed through voter referendum, what majority of the legislature can overrule it?" Answers: 1. N 7/8guf znwbevgl va gur yrtvfyngher pnaabg ercrny guvf zrnfher. 2. Va trareny, va Pnyvsbeavn, ab znwbevgl va gur yrtvfyngher pna bireehyr n onyybg cebcbfvgvba jvgubhg ibgre nccebiny. If you get either of those wrong, the uninformed voter is you.
- Anon1096 6y agoThe point is, if you point to the 7/8 clause as an attack against the prop 22 by saying that it's incredibly hard to modify, you've just revealed that you're an uninformed voter. Ballot measures normally can't be modified by the legislature at all. So it's quite ironic that someone against prop 22 is claiming everyone for it is uninformed while referencing said clause.
- UncleMeat 6y ago> Ballot measures normally can't be modified by the legislature at all. We all know this. The point is that the alternative is one that can be overturned more reasonably. "Ah, but you see this one is slightly easier to modify" is crap, IMO. The choices weren't only "literally no way" or "7/8ths".
- renewiltord 6y agoGoing back to quote a section > ...requires a 7/8ths vote to overturn... This is just not right. You really have to tie yourself up in knots to believe it.