3 ms·

What's the difference between getting addicted to gambling (legal), alcohol (legal), prescription drugs (legal) vs. any criminalized drug? And why does the gove

What's the difference between getting addicted to gambling (legal), alcohol (legal), prescription drugs (legal) vs. any criminalized drug? And why does the government draw this arbitrary line? Before we strawman me, I'm not advocating _all_ drugs become legal, but pointing out the absurdity of the legality of it all. Decriminalization brings on a greater opportunity for rehabilitation without entering the legal system (which lots of people never escape from). Keeping more people in the legal system should not be the goal.

drran 6y ago
Because government is elected by people. Only small portion of people is addicted to drugs, so majority pushed the law against addicts.
- tekknik 6y ago
  Because an addict should just be given whatever they’re addicted too to further their misery and keep them addicted.
  - bird_monster 6y ago
    Can you point out how making a drug illegal keeps it out of the hands of addicts? Sure seems like cocaine has been doing just fine while illegal...
    - tekknik 6y ago
      Because you can’t just go to the store and buy it like you can MJ? We are already seeing an uptick in addictions from MJ, which is much less addicting than cocaine. So, can you point to something showing how decriminalization doesn’t increase the availability, and therefore the suffering of the addicts? Also have you ever been an addict? Are you talking out of experience? If not, then kindly sit down and shut up.
      - bird_monster 6y ago
        > Because you can’t just go to the store and buy it like you can MJ? We are already seeing an uptick in addictions from MJ, which is much less addicting than cocaine. Responding to a request for source without a source is great. > So, can you point to something showing how decriminalization doesn’t increase the availability Ignoring a request for source and then asking for source. > Also have you ever been an addict? Are you talking out of experience? If not, then kindly sit down and shut up. This is a garbage response and shouldn't be welcome on this site. edit Your response is also junk because decriminalization is not the same as legalization, and decriminalization is not the same as allowing dispensaries (medical or otherwise). So your point just kind doesn't make sense with the subject matter and scenario we're talking about.
cflynnus 6y ago
Continuing to make drug sales illegal doesn’t actually do much to limit the availability of drugs. Drugs have never been more accessible or cheap and that trend is likely to continue. I think the government should legalize all drugs so they can control the drug markets and take them away from violent criminal organizations. They can also ensure the drug supplies are safe (devoid of contaminants) as well as tax them to fund social services. There’s always going to be a market for illegal drugs. It gets bigger as time goes on. Better to have it under the control of government and taxed/regulated than underground under the control of cartels

drran 6y ago

Because government is elected by people. Only small portion of people is addicted to drugs, so majority pushed the law against addicts.

tekknik 6y ago
Because an addict should just be given whatever they’re addicted too to further their misery and keep them addicted.
- bird_monster 6y ago
  Can you point out how making a drug illegal keeps it out of the hands of addicts? Sure seems like cocaine has been doing just fine while illegal...
  - tekknik 6y ago
    Because you can’t just go to the store and buy it like you can MJ? We are already seeing an uptick in addictions from MJ, which is much less addicting than cocaine. So, can you point to something showing how decriminalization doesn’t increase the availability, and therefore the suffering of the addicts? Also have you ever been an addict? Are you talking out of experience? If not, then kindly sit down and shut up.
    - bird_monster 6y ago
      > Because you can’t just go to the store and buy it like you can MJ? We are already seeing an uptick in addictions from MJ, which is much less addicting than cocaine. Responding to a request for source without a source is great. > So, can you point to something showing how decriminalization doesn’t increase the availability Ignoring a request for source and then asking for source. > Also have you ever been an addict? Are you talking out of experience? If not, then kindly sit down and shut up. This is a garbage response and shouldn't be welcome on this site. edit Your response is also junk because decriminalization is not the same as legalization, and decriminalization is not the same as allowing dispensaries (medical or otherwise). So your point just kind doesn't make sense with the subject matter and scenario we're talking about.

cflynnus 6y ago

Continuing to make drug sales illegal doesn’t actually do much to limit the availability of drugs. Drugs have never been more accessible or cheap and that trend is likely to continue. I think the government should legalize all drugs so they can control the drug markets and take them away from violent criminal organizations. They can also ensure the drug supplies are safe (devoid of contaminants) as well as tax them to fund social services. There’s always going to be a market for illegal drugs. It gets bigger as time goes on. Better to have it under the control of government and taxed/regulated than underground under the control of cartels