3 ms·
>I don't understand how you can consider that mismanagement of public funds. It seems to satisfy both the capitalist angle and the greater good. As a sharehold
by VladRussian 16y ago
>I don't understand how you can consider that mismanagement of public funds. It seems to satisfy both the capitalist angle and the greater good.
As a shareholder(taxpayer) of this corporation(government) i think it is a mismanagement of the funds to allow for the uncompensated re-assignment of the rights to the direct products of the direct investments done by the corporation. You think it is not. Difference of opinions. As in the example i mentioned before - when contractor/builder gets full rights for the toll on the road he merely built and when he was paid in full for the work - i'd see this as mismanagement, and you'd see this as the capitalist angle and the greater good. Difference of opinions.
- kenjackson 16y agoi'd see this as mismanagement, and you'd see this as the capitalist angle and the greater good. Difference of opinions. Fair enough... maybe it's obvious from the name: VladRussian :-)
- VladRussian 16y agoyep. I've got a chance to study Marxism theory which clearly state main principle of capitalism as "whoever owns the investment owns the profits"