3 ms·
As a non-American, the first time I heard about the situation with broadband monopolies in the US, it was hard for me to believe! Apparently in huge parts of th
by mastazi 6y ago
As a non-American, the first time I heard about the situation with broadband monopolies in the US, it was hard for me to believe! Apparently in huge parts of the country you can only choose one single provider? Is that true just in "regional areas" or in suburbs and urban areas too? Are there stats about how much of the population has no choice?
Edit: the article gives numbers in terms of how many people have access to broadband (and how many haven't) - but what I'm asking is different - what percentage of the population can connect to one and only one broadband provider, based on their location?
- pkaye 6y agoThis the FCC statistics on broadband availability. https://broadbandmap.fcc.gov/#/area-comparison?version=jun2019&tech=acfosw&speed=25_3&searchtype=county https://broadbandmap.fcc.gov/#/area-comparison?version=jun20...
- mastazi 6y agoThank you! this is what I was looking for!
- aidenn0 6y agoIf DSL counts as broadband, then it's about 1/4 the population, if DSL does not count as broadband then it's about 80% of the population. Note that the FCC numbers linked elsewhere are optimistic because of their coarse granularity; if there is a single household with two options in a census region, then all of the population is counted as having it. There's obviously the issues with suburban and rural housing, where density is insufficient for two last-mile solutions (and all local-loop unbundling regulations were so successful in the late 90s that the telecom companies lobbied them out of existence). Something less talked about are the urban apartments where you can only get broadband from the company that contracts with your landlord. If someone that doesn't use the broadband can pick which broadband you use from several options, does that count as competition?