3 ms·
If the text-only experience is good enough, then why bother with encoding and storing a video?
by Retr0spectrum 6y ago
If the text-only experience is good enough, then why bother with encoding and storing a video?
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- apazzolini 6y agoBooks are pretty good, why bother with movies?
- yladiz 6y agoAlthough I agree with you, this comment is missing the mark. Books and films are two fundamentally different mediums and have two different audiences, while this is more about supplementing the text version of something with audio/video. I think that an audio (or video) version would be superior, but more because, assuming there are captions, the audio might be able to describe something beyond the code alone more easily than typing out a note would.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- eru 6y agoIt takes lots and lots of effort to turns books into movies and vice versa. You don't just take a transcript of the dialogue in the movie to make a book.