> Let's take a look at Youtube-dl specifically: So you're going to take a project that does not at all use emails in their workflow as an example for email bas

> Let's take a look at Youtube-dl specifically: So you're going to take a project that does not at all use emails in their workflow as an example for email based workflows? Brilliant. Have you perhaps considered that maybe, if a project actively used emails in any part of their process, maybe addresses would have been more visible? If only we had the means to write arbitrary relevant text on a page such as the one you linked... > But some starting points matter more than others. It objectively does not. Everyone starts once. It only matters for recruitment. However, as you yourself seem to accept "youtube-dl.org" as an acceptable starting point, which can contain arbitrary information in any form, then there is nothing more to discuss here. > ... is not making progress in that discussion. ... Like every argument you've made so far. As this point, I'll consider the discussion as over by three-fold repetition. Everything you have presented has already been answered (directly or indirectly), and the counter-scenarios are all faulty (e.g. discussing doomsday scenarious with no ability to share maintainer addresses yet accepting a website, using a non-email based project as reference for an email workflow, yadda yadda). I'll take my leave.