4 ms·
Regarding the climate data: Climate change is definitely happening. The problem is that the current model for sea ice growth is wrong because we're missing some
by Valgrim 6y ago
Regarding the climate data: Climate change is definitely happening. The problem is that the current model for sea ice growth is wrong because we're missing something (hypotheses need to be tested: maybe the salinity of water is dropping at the surface, maybe there's a change in water currents), but sea ice grow and melt every year. The ice shelves, however, are melting at a record pace.
- dnautics 6y ago"Climate change is definitely happening" This is such a non statement. Climate always changes. The correct statement is "the earth is definitely warming".
- dagss 6y agoNo. Climate does not always change at the extreme rate it is changing now. A change in 4 degrees celsius in a century is very different from a change in 4 degrees celsius over 10 000 years. The term "climate change" almost always refers to the current rapid changes over a century as opposed to natural rates of change; if someone misunderstands that I suspect that it is because they have decided to misunderstand it.
- bananamerica 6y agoThe term “climate change” has a universally accepted meaning and ignoring that is useless nitpicking. There’s a rhetorical component to language.
- dnautics 6y agoNo it's not. When language is changed as a coordinated political effort to rebrand something it creates something akin to a streisand effect. For commercial products, whatever, no press is bad press. For science, it's a problem.
- twojacobtwo 6y agoThis is just being pedantic. I have never encountered anyone in-person who did not immediately understand and/or equate "climate change" as "the earth is warming". If we want to get the message across to the average person, this type of tut-tut message does no good.
- dnautics 6y agoReally? The problem is that changing the goalposts/rebranding is fodder for deniers.
- twojacobtwo 6y agoThat is a fair point. I do recognize the need to differentiate the two as soon as it becomes obvious that someone is trying to use the term to dispute the facts, but I find that most people just want to use the term they know and end up feeling burned if they're corrected while they're already trying to advance the cause.