3 ms·
Doesn't that kind of defeat the point of "serverless", though? I mean, I guess if that's how you like to structure your code then go for it, but the primary ma
by yellowapple 6y ago
Doesn't that kind of defeat the point of "serverless", though? I mean, I guess if that's how you like to structure your code then go for it, but the primary marketing pitch I've ever heard was around it, you know, absolving developers of the need to worry about servers.
I guess if you've got a large enough environment that you have dedicated devs pushing things to Kubeless/Knative instances maintained by dedicated ops/sysdmins, then maybe that's the niche there?
- jacques_chester 6y agoIt depends on what you think "serverless" means. Is it solely about the developer experience? Or is it about the economic ownership of hardware? Or both?
- imglorp 6y agoI was referring specifically to lambda-style "functions as a managed service", which might be a better term than serverless. Managed instance would be serverless by the economic definition.