4 ms·
Are you joking about the self hosted runners? The fact that you can’t: 1) Apply any security policy for runners (e.g. require a label before running a PR) 2) H
by amscanne 6y ago
Are you joking about the self hosted runners?
The fact that you can’t:
1) Apply any security policy for runners (e.g. require a label before running a PR)
2) Have runners quit after a single job so you can build ephemeral runners
3) Build your own runner against an open API
... means that self hosted runners are non starter for anything open source. It’s like they had to try hard to make the architecture that obtuse and closed. It’s unclear if it’s really poor/design or an active attempt to somehow drive the business.
- bredren 6y agoThe software I’ve been working with for self hosted runners is closed source. I’ve had a (largely) good experience with them so far.