5 ms·
Sigh... I am not trying to say React is bad. I'm just saying that for some people it's hard to learn because there are so many different things packaged there t
by antris 6y ago
Sigh... I am not trying to say React is bad. I'm just saying that for some people it's hard to learn because there are so many different things packaged there that it looks like a framework. I love React, I'm just saying it's not a perfect learning experience.
If that's too harsh of a criticism about React to you, that's fine, but I am not interested in continuing the discussion as it is rapidly moving away from my original point and your tone is becoming hostile.
- dmitriid 6y ago> I'm just saying that for some people it's hard to learn because there are so many different things packaged there that it looks like a framework. There are many different things packaged there now. When it as released it had maybe two concepts, and you could get started with it in under an hour. > it is rapidly moving away from my original point and your tone is becoming hostile. The original point you presented was: "There's no reason why JSX had to be included at the same time with React. There's no reason for it to provide classes, the whole bells and whistles. They could have released just the Virtual DOM part of the library" which just makes little sense. And I never moved away from it, showing how wrong your recollection of React is. You yourself decided to move away from it somehow deciding to talk about Redux, and how it's hard to learn React today.