3 ms·
Could someone explain how these laws' delineate hate speech vs. non-hate speech? I suspect that any discussions about these laws will really benefit from a cl
by DoofusOfDeath 6y ago
Could someone explain how these laws' delineate hate speech vs. non-hate speech?
I suspect that any discussions about these laws will really benefit from a clear understanding of the laws' precision and scope.
- andor 6y ago§1(3) NetzDG (Network Enforcement Act): "Unlawful content is content in the sense of paragraph 1 that fulfills the requirements of §§ * 86 (Dissemination of propaganda material of unconstitutional organisations) * 86a (Use of symbols of unconstitutional organisations) * 89a (Preparation of serious violent offence endangering state) * 91 (Instructions for committing serious violent offence endangering state) * 100a (Treasonous forgery) * 111 (Public incitement to commit offences) * 126 (Disturbing public peace by threatening to commit offences) * 129 to 129b (Forming criminal organisations, Forming terrorist organisations, Foreign criminal and terrorist organisations; confiscation) * 130 (Incitement of masses) * 131 (Depictions of violence) * 140 (Rewarding and approval of offences) * 166 (Revilement of religious faiths and religious and ideological communities) * 184b (Dissemination, procurement and possession of child pornography) in connection with 184d (Making pornographic content available through broadcasting or telemedia services; accessing child or youth pornographic content via telemedia) * 185 to 187 (Insult, Malicious gossip (üble Nachrede), Defamation) * 201a (Violation of intimate privacy by taking photographs or other images) * 241 (Threatening commission of serious criminal offence) * 269 (Forgery of data of probative value) of the StGB (criminal code) and not justified." Criminal code translated to English, for details on all these points: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stgb/index.html#gl_p0012 http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stgb/index.html#g...