4 ms·
What a pathetic non-reply. Those are direct questions to vague statements you made in that comment. It's clear now that you're not going substantiate anything
by jahaja 6y ago
What a pathetic non-reply. Those are direct questions to vague statements you made in that comment.
It's clear now that you're not going substantiate anything since it would just display your ignorance.
- chrisseaton 6y agoYou're just being abusive now. I'm not sure why you feel the need to resort to this kind of language. The original question was 'what’s wrong with trying to force everyone to be financially more or less equal'. What’s wrong with it is every time someone tries this it ends up hell on earth. That’s it. That’s the whole point. No implications, no allusions. If that's not good enough for you, sorry nothing I can do about that. Maybe move on?
- jahaja 6y agoSigh, and we're back to vague generalizations with zero effort nor intent to go beyond superficialities: > What’s wrong with it is every time someone tries this it ends up hell on earth. No surprise that you latch on to tone policing either. I rest my case.
- chrisseaton 6y agoIt's not 'tone policing' to ask someone to not use personal abuse! Please check the site guidelines https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html. > When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names.