3 ms·
mmm, i wouldn't say that. arrow is really meant as a lower-level utility with usability abstractions layered on top. for low-level tasks, like serializing/deser
by igor47 6y ago
mmm, i wouldn't say that. arrow is really meant as a lower-level utility with usability abstractions layered on top. for low-level tasks, like serializing/deserializing, arrow is amazing, but if you want to actually explore or transform data, arrow's not really usable (based on about a day of trying).
this, on the other hand, looks like something i might use to actually play with data and allow others to follow along.