5 ms·
"Lets not argue over the interpretation of the concept of rights, lets just accept my interpretation". Why didn't anybody think of it earlier!
by Kbelicius 6y ago
"Lets not argue over the interpretation of the concept of rights, lets just accept my interpretation". Why didn't anybody think of it earlier!
- aww_dang 6y agoWould you agree that a right to property would precede a right to interfere with another's property? Would a right for the public to know the specific steps an entity uses to retain property go even further afield from the original premise? Hopefully this clarifies my intent. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_and_positive_rights#:~:text=As%20such%2C%20negative%20rights%20exist,of%20another%20person%20or%20group.&text=In%20theory%2C%20a%20negative%20right,respect%20to%20the%20right%20holder https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_and_positive_rights#:.... Stacking new positive rights upon each other seems like an inferior solution as compared to the original, simple solution of respecting private property. Where does the expansion of positive rights end?