4 ms·
From the wiki article YOU quoted (USA specific) > there is an absence of cases actually giving any value to the poor man's copyright.
by njharman 6y ago
From the wiki article YOU quoted (USA specific)
> there is an absence of cases actually giving any value to the poor man's copyright.
- amingilani 6y agoYes, but that doesn't mean it can't be unenforceable. It simply means it hasn't passed the test of a court. However, isn't the same, from my limited research and knowledge, true for blockchain-based notarization?
- sebmellen 6y agohttps://cryptoadventure.org/blockchain-in-courts-a-look-into-blockchain-evidence-in-global-courts/ https://cryptoadventure.org/blockchain-in-courts-a-look-into... blockchain timestamping is pretty well tested. Edit: I would really appreciate it if the downvoters would at least attempt to have a discussion. The dogpiling tactic seems to be rather thoughtless.
- sebmellen 6y agoI would refer you to https://cryptoadventure.org/blockchain-in-courts-a-look-into-blockchain-evidence-in-global-courts/ https://cryptoadventure.org/blockchain-in-courts-a-look-into.... Poor man's copyright without cryptographic proof or an immutable time boundary is pretty much worthless.