3 ms·

That's not why I use Brave lol. At this point: I use Chrome for one Metamask HD sequence I use Firefox for another Metamask HD sequence I use Brave for anot

That's not why I use Brave lol. At this point: I use Chrome for one Metamask HD sequence I use Firefox for another Metamask HD sequence I use Brave for another Metamask HD sequence Funny to say this, but I use so many browsers mostly for accounting purposes. I wish there was a good wallet that maintained multiple HD paths and assisted in other best practices.

collsni 6y ago
Why not just use firefox profiles ?
- vmception 6y ago
  for one it sounds like then I would have to use Firefox more often, I like the Chrome interface more although I can concede the resource hogging has gotten annoying for two, I don't know anything about Firefox profiles, does that create a profile for my extensions too? Will multiple firefox profiles have different metamask instances segregated?
  - mkl 6y ago
    Then why not Chrome profiles? As with Firefox, the profiles are completely disconnected, and have different history, extensions, cookies, etc. If you don't like Chrome's resource hogging, try something like The Great Suspender.
    - everythingswan 6y ago
      I've been using this combo for a while and it works really well. I have 2-4 profiles open at one time and just whitelist my inbox and a few other sites/apps I frequent while working. Great Suspender makes it totally viable.
    - spurgu 6y ago
      Firefox containers share extensions, but maybe Firefox has profiles as well that I haven't noticed (after using it for 2-3 weeks now)?
  - Slikey 6y ago
    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/multi-account-containers/ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/multi-account... I've started using them recently to have entirely seperate environments for personal and work websites and it's a blessing. Previously I used 2 browsers just like you, now I have the unlimited power of Firefox AdBlockers in every environment.
    - tzs 6y ago
      Doesn't that just provide separation of cookies (and maybe cache)? If you want entirely separate environments (cookies, cache, bookmarks, history, extensions) I believe you need to use multiple profiles.

collsni 6y ago

Why not just use firefox profiles ?

vmception 6y ago
for one it sounds like then I would have to use Firefox more often, I like the Chrome interface more although I can concede the resource hogging has gotten annoying for two, I don't know anything about Firefox profiles, does that create a profile for my extensions too? Will multiple firefox profiles have different metamask instances segregated?
- mkl 6y ago
  Then why not Chrome profiles? As with Firefox, the profiles are completely disconnected, and have different history, extensions, cookies, etc. If you don't like Chrome's resource hogging, try something like The Great Suspender.
  - everythingswan 6y ago
    I've been using this combo for a while and it works really well. I have 2-4 profiles open at one time and just whitelist my inbox and a few other sites/apps I frequent while working. Great Suspender makes it totally viable.
  - spurgu 6y ago
    Firefox containers share extensions, but maybe Firefox has profiles as well that I haven't noticed (after using it for 2-3 weeks now)?
- Slikey 6y ago
  https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/multi-account-containers/ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/multi-account... I've started using them recently to have entirely seperate environments for personal and work websites and it's a blessing. Previously I used 2 browsers just like you, now I have the unlimited power of Firefox AdBlockers in every environment.
  - tzs 6y ago
    Doesn't that just provide separation of cookies (and maybe cache)? If you want entirely separate environments (cookies, cache, bookmarks, history, extensions) I believe you need to use multiple profiles.