2 ms·
CNAME cloaking is only the first of many possible mitigations. CNAME flattening would be the next likely angle of attack. Advertisers can very well get website
by ignoramous 6y ago
CNAME cloaking is only the first of many possible mitigations. CNAME flattening would be the next likely angle of attack.
Advertisers can very well get websites to run "cloud functions" at the edge (with Fastly, Cloudflare, Netlify, Vercel, AWS Lambda etc) under the first-party domain, and the content blockers (native or not) will be none the wiser. This is similar to how content blockers struggle to block ads served from first-party domains on YouTube and other Facebook properties.
Exhibit A: https://github.com/samkelleher/cloudflare-worker-google-analytics https://github.com/samkelleher/cloudflare-worker-google-anal...
- antonok 6y agoOf course, adblocking has always been and will always be a game of cat-and-mouse. Interesting link. I will say though, Brave's been aggressively pushing for an end to third-party cookies, and if websites are increasingly forced to run first-party analytics as a counter-measure, that is still a major win for the internet as a whole.