4 ms·
"that being said I don't have the time to give you a full introduction on Marxian economics" Thanks, but not interested anyway. Read enough of him to dismiss i
by hutzlibu 6y ago
"that being said I don't have the time to give you a full introduction on Marxian economics"
Thanks, but not interested anyway. Read enough of him to dismiss it. And we seem to be in 2 different realities anyway.
Anyway:
"I've never heard of big socialists group who do not want total egalitarianism in the end".
you may insert a radical
Obviously there are also many soft version of socialism. Here in germany they are regulary part of the government. But not really socialist. When referring from the very radical leftwing socialists. And I thought those are the types we are speaking about, when refering to revolutionary spain. And of this group, the ones I met, were mainly literal egalitarian. Sometimes even without the concept of personal property etc., mostly with. But negating the concept of rich people was the unifying idea.
So if you insist to never met a socialist like that, than I just keep on not taking you serious.
- claudiawerner 6y ago>Thanks, but not interested anyway. Read enough of him to dismiss it. I wonder how some economists, even Nobel prize winners, do not consider this to be the case. Even if they think Marx is wrong, they do not dismiss him because they think he is not worth consideration, but because (they say) he was wrong. Popper took the same approach.
- sudosysgen 6y agoI've been asking you for four comments to mention a single socialist theorician that wants total egalitarianism in the end. Why don't you just provide one name? As for dismissing Marian economics, you may do it if you want, but I personally think it's better to consider it then deciding whether or not it is correct. I'm not an economist, so I'll defer to the PhDs and renowned economics professor that seem to think that there is value in there as a complement to other exonomic theories.